g4lly Posted November 9, 2011 Share Posted November 9, 2011 Nov 8/11: At US Senate Armed Services Committee hearings on Counterfeit Electronic Parts in the DOD Supply Chain, it’s revealed that suspect electronic parts from China have been installed on a variety of military systems and subsystems, including C-27Js. [me=g4lly]se marre[/me] Depuis le temps que la défense US cherche une parade a ca ... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
alexandreVBCI Posted November 9, 2011 Share Posted November 9, 2011 Le problème de composants électroniques d'origine chinoise dans les appareils américains, plus grave que prévu : DoD’s vendors must bear the cost when they or military officials discover their products include fake electronic components, Sen. Carl Levin demanded Tuesday. Levin, chairman of the Senate Armed Services Committee, charged out of the gate this week on a campaign to stop the flood of fake parts finding their way into military electronics. By forcing the Raytheons and Lockheed Martins of the world to eat the costs of replacing faulty parts, the companies will have an incentive to crack down on their suppliers and ensure they’re buying only new, good-quality components, Levin said. Although the problem of fraudulent electronic components has been broached before in media reports, Levin’s committee has been investigating them on its own and it uncovered fresh problems. He detailed how fake microprocessors and other electronic parts had made their way into equipment aboard Navy SH-60B Seahawk helicopters; the Air Force’s C-27J Spartan cargo plane; and the Navy’s new P-8 Poseidon anti-submarine patrol plane. Plus a committee witness described buying fake voltage regulators that are used in Air Force C-130s; Navy F/A-18E Super Hornets; the Marines’ MV-22 Osprey; and Navy Los Angeles-class attack submarines. But everyone involved acknowledged there would be no simple solution to this problem. Ralph DeNiro, vice president of L-3 Communications, said one major problem is the age of many of the military’s ships, vehicles and aircraft, which, in some cases, need parts no longer made by their original manufacturers. That means the services must broaden the base of third-party companies from which they buy replacements, increasing the risks of fakes. Tuesday’s hearing represented the dark side of DoD’s acceptance of a “globally sourced” supply chain: Chinese officials would not permit Senate investigators to visit the counterfeit chip shops of Shenzhen, Levin said, and they were taking no action to crack down on them. So although DoD and Congress can try to throw up better screens to try to filter out the bad components in its supply chain, they apparently can do nothing about the source. Lawmakers and witnesses made it sound as though the counterfeit parts were just local criminal fraud with new global ramifications, not a deliberate campaign of sabotage. But the stories Tuesday did raise more questions about the integrity of DoD’s computers and electronics. North Carolina Sen. Kay Hagan asked rhetorically how the Pentagon could be sure it wasn’t buying computer equipment it believed was secure, but which included fake or even malicious chips to help China with espionage or cyber-attacks. Government Accountability Office investigator Richard Hillman said he believed Shenzhen’s counterfeiters were mostly “boiler room” operations, but he said he couldn’t rule out the possibility that malicious fake chips could be part of this poisoned well. http://www.dodbuzz.com/2011/11/08/sasc-warns-about-fake-electronic-components/ Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dark sidius Posted November 9, 2011 Share Posted November 9, 2011 Quand est ce que l'on va comprendre que la Chine est un danger pour les forces occidentales. Ils jouent en permanence la carte de l'espionage et de la copie. Pour nos armements il vaut mieux confier la fabrication d'appareils sensible a nos industries. Sous couvert de faire du commerce ils piratent tout. D'ailleurs ils on déja laminé notre industrie et un peut celle des USA et on continue comme ci de rien n'était a leur faire confiance, la dernière en date avec l'aide qu'ils veulent apporter a l'Europe, ce serait une erreur stratégique monumentale. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MH Posted November 16, 2011 Share Posted November 16, 2011 L’Air Force a officiellement reçu ses premières MOP (Massive Ordnance Penetrator) de 13~14 tonnes sur une commande de 16 exemplaires. Mahmoud, tic-tac tic-tac… http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?f=/g/a/2011/11/14/bloomberg_articlesLUO5DT0D9L35.DTL Edit: ARrrgh! déjà posté. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dark sidius Posted November 16, 2011 Share Posted November 16, 2011 Ca doit taper. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
leclercs Posted November 17, 2011 Share Posted November 17, 2011 un énorme suppositoire si on enlève les ailes, de la à dire qu'il vise quelqu'un en particulier... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MH Posted November 22, 2011 Share Posted November 22, 2011 Les USA travail sur un missile de croisière furtif avec une charge à énergie dirigé à haute puissance à base de micro ondes. Le concept pourrait être appliqué à des drones furtifs capables d’effectuer plusieurs « tirs ». http://www.aviationweek.com/aw/generic/story.jsp?id=news/awst/2011/11/21/AW_11_21_2011_p29-395318.xml&headline=First%20Look:%20Electronic%20Warfare%20Missile%20&channel=awst Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
syntaxerror9 Posted November 22, 2011 Share Posted November 22, 2011 MOP:Faudra un système de visée terminal hyper précis pour placer cet énorme suppositoire là oú il faut. =) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Perry Posted December 27, 2011 Share Posted December 27, 2011 Le V-2 AESA en 2009. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Philippe Top-Force Posted February 4, 2012 Author Share Posted February 4, 2012 Grande braderie organisée et affaires à saisir :lol:http://www.air-cosmos.com/defense/201202020185030/lusaf-au-regime-sec.html Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
pascal Posted February 4, 2012 Share Posted February 4, 2012 Je me souviens de cette photo de F15 C les premiers livrés furent affectés en Alaska.Il me semble qu'aujourd'hui les F15 C AESA sont affectés à hauteur de 3/4 par squadrons de 24 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Fusilier Posted February 4, 2012 Share Posted February 4, 2012 Grande braderie organisée et affaires à saisir :lol: http://www.air-cosmos.com/defense/201202020185030/lusaf-au-regime-sec.html C'est le moment d’acheter des A10, les verrait bien sur le PA Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jojo67 Posted February 4, 2012 Share Posted February 4, 2012 C'est le moment d’acheter des A10, les verrait bien sur le PA Euh, il a fumé de la moquette, le Fusilier??? =D Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Philippe Top-Force Posted February 5, 2012 Author Share Posted February 5, 2012 C'est le moment d’acheter des A10, les verrait bien sur le PA Je ne sais même pas si il y a eu UN pilote US faire des touch and go avec un A10 sur un CVN. ...faudrait investiguer. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rob1 Posted February 5, 2012 Share Posted February 5, 2012 Apparemment non... sans doute que ni l'USAF ni la Navy n'a envie de risquer d'avoir une réponse positive :lol: Dans les simus, ca passe... Dans la réalité, il manque : - une crosse d'apontage (ca, ca doit être faisable) et la résistance structurelle qui va avec (ca, moins) - un train avant compatible catapulte (idem) et la résistance structurelle qui va avec (idem) - des ailes repliables Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
penaratahiti Posted February 8, 2012 Share Posted February 8, 2012 un nouveau camo en essais sur F-16 : peinture un peu furtive à la F-35 ? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jérôme Posted February 9, 2012 Share Posted February 9, 2012 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dino Posted February 9, 2012 Share Posted February 9, 2012 On dirait, l'entrée d'air est aussi différente. Ce quelle version du F-16 ? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
pascal Posted February 9, 2012 Share Posted February 9, 2012 vu la sonde c'est un proto et peut-être même un photo retaillée même si ce cliché me parle Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mat Posted February 9, 2012 Share Posted February 9, 2012 C'est pas un F16 XL ? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
FATac Posted February 9, 2012 Share Posted February 9, 2012 Non, c'est l'essai d'entrée d'air DSI et furtive qui a été mené il y a quelques années (1996 plus précisément)Si vous google-isez "F-16 DSI", vous aurez plein d'articles et de photos. Rien qui va au fond des choses, mais un bon survol général. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Oberoth Posted February 9, 2012 Share Posted February 9, 2012 Je sais pas dire pourquoi mais il me fait pensé à un Eurofighter dans cette vue là. En plus joli bien sûre. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
penaratahiti Posted February 9, 2012 Share Posted February 9, 2012 c'est la même évolution qu'entre le J-10A et le J-10B côté chinois. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Chevalier Gilles Posted February 9, 2012 Share Posted February 9, 2012 le F-16 DSI était normalement juste pour valider les dsi du jsf non? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
penaratahiti Posted February 9, 2012 Share Posted February 9, 2012 le F-16 DSI était normalement juste pour valider les dsi du jsf non? exact, c'est un projet de LM. Ce concept est implémenté sur F-35, JF-17, J-10B et J-20 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now