Bon Plan
-
Compteur de contenus
6 231 -
Inscription
-
Dernière visite
-
Jours gagnés
20
Tout ce qui a été posté par Bon Plan
-
Ah ? des détails stp.
-
toujours aussi aimable.... Tu te rends compte que tu passes pour un gros c*n ?
-
Pourquoi pas un porte-avions franco-européen ? https://www.latribune.fr/opinions/tribunes/pourquoi-pas-un-porte-avions-franco-europeen-831590.html#xtor=EPR-2-[l-actu-du-jour]-20191025
-
et moins de dettes aussi..... et accessoirement un rideaux de fer avec de gros méchants rouges assoiffés de sang de l'autre coté.
-
Moi je propose une sortie par le haut au niveau motorisation : Un SCAF français motorisé par un M888 de 13T de poussée, >2200° de TeT Un SCAF allemand motoriés par un RB199-2z de 7T de poussée et 1600° de TeT. In ze pocket.
-
Vu que la NEZ du Meteor semble être autour des 60km, le RDY ou RC400 ou RDY400... voyant à au moins 100km un chasseur pourrait exploiter un Meteor de belle manière. Mais je pense qu'il en est en France du Meteor comme des AASM : on favorise le Rafale (indépendamment du Pb d'intégration au M2000 de ce long missile)
-
Non. L'ATF a son lancement était prévu pour 750 exemplaires. J'peux pas lutter. J'abandonne....
-
Trop feignasse hier pour ça... et puis tu es intoxiqué par Deepl. Tellement que ca te fait voir des M88 de 8.3T de poussée partout. C'est dire.
-
Ca clos le rêve humide des indiens de mettre du Meteor sur leur M2000.
-
C'te photo ! un régal.
-
F-35 Update: Don't Fly Too Fast or It Might Fall Apart Another revelation about the money pit in the sky. BY CHARLES P. PIERCE JUN 12, 2019 One of our regular features here at the shebeen is checking out the latest on the F-35, a.k.a. the money pit in the sky, a.k.a. The Flying Swiss Army Knife. (In addition, the president* may believe that it is actually invisible, like Wonder Woman's plane.) Usually, when we check in, we find that, once again, the project is beset with unforeseen gremlins, like the furry dude that Shatner sees on the wing in that episode of the Twilight Zone. Once again, the F-35 doesn't disappoint. From Defense News: According to documents exclusively obtained by Defense News, the F-35 continues to be marred by flaws and glitches that, if left unfixed, could create risks to pilot safety and call into question the fighter jet’s ability to accomplish key parts of its mission: F-35B and F-35C pilots, compelled to observe limitations on airspeed to avoid damage to the F-35’s airframe or stealth coating. Cockpit pressure spikes that cause “excruciating” ear and sinus pain. Issues with the helmet-mounted display and night vision camera that contribute to the difficulty of landing the F-35C on an aircraft carrier. To the untrained observer, "limitations on airspeed to avoid damage to the F-35's airframe" reads a lot like, "Don't fly this state-of-the-art warplane too fast or it will fall apart." And from this the untrained observer might also conclude that producing a state-of-the-art warplane that can't land on an aircraft carrier brings air power back to a point somewhere half-past the Sopwith Camel. The untrained observer might then conclude that this whole project is the equivalent of dumping the contents of 1,000 Brinks trucks on the National Mall and setting the bills on fire. These problems impact far more operators than the U.S. Air Force, Marine Corps and Navy customer base. Eleven countries — Australia, Belgium, Denmark, Italy, Israel, the Netherlands, Norway, Japan, South Korea, Turkey and the United Kingdom — have all selected the aircraft as their future fighter of choice, and nine partner nations have contributed funds to the development of the F-35. Taken together, these documents provide evidence that the F-35 program is still grappling with serious technical problems, even as it finds itself in a key transitional moment. Which is? And the clock is ticking. By the end of 2019, Defense Department leaders are set to make a critical decision on whether to shut the door on the F-35’s development stage and move forward with full-rate production. During this period, the yearly production rate will skyrocket from the 91 jets manufactured by Lockheed Martin in 2018 to upward of 160 by 2023. Generally speaking, the department’s policy calls for all deficiencies to be closed before full-rate production starts. This is meant to cut down on expensive retrofits needed to bring existing planes to standard. What are the odds that this policy will be adhered to in this case? Nine out of 13 problems will likely either be corrected or downgraded to category 2 status before the Pentagon determines whether to start full-rate production, and two will be adjudicated in future software builds, Winter said. However, the F-35 program office has no intention of correcting two of the problems addressed in the documents, with the department opting to accept additional risk. The rules of what Barney Frank used to call "military Keynesianism" are simple. Throw so much money into a project that, by the time anyone notices, it's too embarrassing to cancel the project generally, and too politically risky to cancel it for the politicians in the districts wherein the project is being assembled. Then, downgrade the problems, fudge the data, minimize the actual risks with bureaucratic gobbledegook, and then sell the luckless sonuvabitch around the world. To wit: Winter maintains that none of the issues represent any serious or catastrophic risk to pilots, the mission or the F-35 airframe. After being contacted by Defense News, the program office created two designations of category 1 problems to highlight the difference between issues that would qualify as an emergency and others that are more minor in nature.“CAT 1-As are loss of life, potential loss of life, loss of material aircraft. Those have to be adjudicated, have to be corrected within hours, days. We have no CAT 1-A deficiencies,” Winter said. Instead, the deficiencies on the books all fall under category 1B, which represents problems “that have a mission impact with a current workaround that’s acceptable to the war fighter with the knowledge that we will be able to correct that deficiency at some future time,” Winter added. Lovely. Ask the folks at Boeing how that kind of process is working out for them these days.
-
US Military’s Trillion-Dollar F-35 Fighter Jet Is Almost Unflyable By: Kristin Houser in Advanced Transport 13-Jun-2019 Expensive Failure The F-35 is supposed to play a major role in the future of the U.S. military — the Air Force, Navy, and Marine Corps each plan to replace existing aircraft with variations of the in-development fighter jet. But problems have plagued the F-35 program for several years. And now, a Defense News investigation has revealed several previously unreported problemswith the jet — meaning the trillion-dollar program may be in even worse shape than the public knew. Problems Mount Documents obtained by Defense Newsprovide details on 13 of the F-35’s most serious flaws, which include spikes in cabin pressure that cause pilots to experience severe ear and sinus pain. Pilots of certain versions of the F-35 also can’t fully control the aircraft’s pitch, roll, and yaw after completing certain maneuvers — and in some conditions, the aircraft’s night vision camera displays green horizontal lines that make it difficult for pilots to see the horizon. No Worries As alarming as these issues sound, Greg Ulmer, Lockheed Martin’s VP for the F-35 program, seemed unfazed. “These issues are important to address, and each is well understood, resolved, or on a path to resolution,” he told Defense News. “We’ve worked collaboratively with our customers, and we are fully confident in the F-35’s performance and the solutions in place to address each of the items identified.” Source: Futurism
-
Non, c'est pas bien.... le Mig 29 plus discret que le Rafale ...... Ah oui, c'est une étude russe, donc parfaitement intègre et objective
-
In 2008, RAND's John Stillion and Harold Scott Perdue (both former military aviators) concluded : The F-35 is double-inferior.” “Inferior acceleration, inferior climb [rate], inferior sustained turn capability…[it] also has lower top speed. Can’t turn, can’t climb, can’t run.” Je ne vois pas ce qui aurait changé. Peut être tourne il un peu mieux....
-
Je suis chef d'entreprise (en plus d'être salarié d'une autre) : je me sens fondé à dire cela. Le taux d'imposition était, est et reste très fort. Quand aux charges sociales... Entre ton net et ce que ton entreprise paye, le rapport est de 2. Rien que ça.
-
Le developpement de Spectra a drainé 25% du cout de R&D du programme Rafale....
-
On ne l'a plus. On est un pays moyen, avec une population qui s'embourgeoise et qui vieillit, donc il ne faut plus compter sur un sursaut d'orgueil pour baisser nos dépenses sociales au profit de dépenses de souveraineté. La paix sociale qui passe par 650 milliards de transferts sociaux par an au travers de 57 aides sociales... Soutien du privé.... pourquoi inéfficace? Les boites françaises sont les plus taxées de l'OCDE. et le contre exemple de certaines boites comme Total n'est qu'un contre exemple limité (et courant dans le monde. Disons que Total use à merveille des subtilités fiscales). Le CICE n'est à me yeux qu'une rétrocession de prélèvements exorbitants sur les entreprises.
-
Jamais entendu parler de ce canon mitrailleur coaxial. Tu as plus de sources ? Collaborer ou mourir. L'idée maîtresse est que la France va avoir le lead technologique du SCAF, et qu'à l'inverse ca sera les allemands qui l'auront pour le MBT. Mais chaque pays récupérera 50% des charges de production de chaque projet (si tant est que les commandes soient kif kif des 2 cotés du rhin... mais ca c'est un sujet pour dans 20 ans)
-
Je viens de lire dans Air et Cosmos que : Les Rafales des FAS vont intégrer le standard F3R (ca on savait), et aussi l'ASN4G dés 2035, et ce avant le SCAF. A moins de les emmener sous voilure, ca donne une indication de la longueur de l'ASN4G...
-
Rafale D. D comme discret. Ce qui est un élément de plus justifiant les travaux menés entre le A et le D (devenus C, B et M). S'ils évoluent comme le Tejas indien, on peut rester serein....
-
La conséquence, heureuse, à été de rechercher des solutions françaises. C'est peut être grâce à ça que le véhicule a roues de la gamme de 15t du programme Scorpion (j'ai plus son petit nom) à des trains d'une PME française.
-
ben peu à mon avis. Il y a eu une vente de véhicules a roues bloquée (annulée? relancée?) en Arabie Saoudite parce que les allemands refusaient que les trains roulants, allemands, soient exportés vers ce client là. C'est le dernier dont je me rappelle, et ca a quelques années.
-
Il en reste beaucoup ?
-
Dans le monde de l'entreprise privée, on est parfois passé du chariot élévateur thermique avec un conducteur à un AGV électrique et automatique. Ca se gère. Ca s'anticipe. Et ca fonctionne. C'est ca le progrès. Sinon on en reste à la machine à vapeur. Le Blitzkrieg subit, pour moi un ca suffit. Le prochain je veux que ce soit nous qui soyons en situation de le mener.
