(^ personne ne sait?)
Q. You recently told the corps of military engineers that to be fully interoperable in the Afghan theater, you need the Rover terminal. Will the Damocles targeting and Reco NG reconnaissance pods be compatible?
A. We're totally interoperable. We demonstrate that every day in Afghanistan with the Rafale and Mirage 2000D, which are fully integrated into the network, into communications, command and control, in the concept of operations and planning. We're able to exchange information in real time between the air and ground. What's lacking is a piece of equipment which allows real-time video transmission between air and ground. This equipment appeared recently and imposed itself extremely quickly in operations. We were a bit late because we started off with exchanges of fixed images. Steps are being taken. I have every hope we will begin to equip our forces this autumn. Our approach is to apply lessons from the battlefield to equipment.
Q. What do you say to critics who say that with engagements in complex urban environments, UAVs and precision-guided missiles, there is less need for a Cold War weapon like the Rafale?
A. The operations we're doing in Afghanistan show the contrary. The Rafale is the only one in its category which is truly multimission. It is equipped with fully fused sensors, with a remarkable man-machine interface, the only one of its generation to be combat-proven. On its third campaign in Afghanistan, what we see is that the choices that were made correspond to operational needs, with the capacity to be inserted into a complex network, with great autonomy, with highly precise sensors and a range of weapons which allows response to all situations.
It is a new aircraft designed with an open architecture, which allows for evolution to meet future strategic environments. The fighter has a long life ahead of it, working in a mixed environment with the drone - which I never call a pilotless aircraft, because there is always a pilot flying remotely.
Q. Connectivity is seen as key to the F-22 and F-35, which are described as flying combat systems. How far are you in developing a concept of operations which fully uses the Rafale's sensors and communications?
A. The progress the Rafale brings is that it is equipped with a large number of sensors capable of receiving and transmitting real-time information. The information gathered by the sensors is easily usable by the pilot and neighboring aircraft thanks to command-and-control aircraft and satellite communications.
Q. Does the greater workload require more twin-seater Rafales?
A. Yes. Our concept is a mixed fleet with single and twin seaters. The final ratio has not been decided. We're working on a lot of the lessons from Afghanistan. The initial choice was to acquire twin seaters for training/transformation and the toughest missions, such as nuclear deterrence, and complex and demanding operations. The Rafale has an interface that allows it to be used by a single pilot, but there are situations where two on board is a plus. The ratio of twin seaters at the start is high as first we need to train, and second, we're equipping the nuclear squadrons, and we need to acquire experience. Eventually, a ratio of 30 [percent] to 60 percent.
http://www.defensenews.com/story.php?i=4127278&c=FEA&s=INT