xav

Parait il que le Ka-52 est trop haut pour tenir dans le hangar des BPC

RTD eux meme m'ont dit que c'est pas prévu, que c'est uniquement pour l'export "normalement"... mais vu l'économie et vu que ça ne va pas en s’arrangeant finalement ça pourrait etre une solution pas mal

Et soulignons aussi que les SEM restant sont quand meme sacrement évolués, et jusqu’à pas longtemps, étaient les seuls appareil de la MN a pouvoir emporter un pot de désignation... Bref ils restent utile, et on l'a bien vu en Libye encore.

Nouveau camo pour les Mi-28 qui iront peut etre sur les Mistralsky Ca rappel un peut les Yak-38 bleus de l'époque

Merci pour l'info, mais pas la peine de leur faire de la pub ceci dit O0

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6an4zSj8LhU loal

Il y aurait plein de "trous" dans le rapport de l'AIEA Iran nuclear report: Why it may not be a game-changer after all The Iran nuclear report released yesterday by the UN nuclear watchdog agency sought to corroborate details provided by US intelligence in 2005. But some nuclear experts are unconvinced. http://www.csmonitor.com/World/Middle-East/2011/1109/Iran-nuclear-report-Why-it-may-not-be-a-game-changer-after-all?cmpid=ema:nws:Daily%20Custom%202%20%2811092011%29&cmpid=ema:nws:NzQ4MDU0ODA5NQS2

Et l'electronique + radar sont surtout Israéliens non? Elbit je crois...

"Armoured Multirole Carrier (ATC)" lol Mais j'adore l'AMC, avec son look il aurait pu tourner dans Aliens

Pas étonnant du tout.

Boeing receives $1.7 Billion for 7 more US Navy P-8A Poseidon Maritime Patrol Aircraft http://www.navyrecognition.com/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=180 $1.7 milliard... pour un peut plus, on se paye un PA2 avec ça!

Un autre "rapport" sur les armes de la région http://www.ndufoundation.org/document.doc?id=39

D'ici là, la techno aura évolué, si il faut Thales (ou autre) aura sorti un radar de la taille d'Herakles mais plus performant que S1850M et EMPAR combiné... Déjà les radar type TRS4D c'est un progres par rapport à la techno du Herakles, c'est du AESA http://www.armyrecognition.com/dsei_2011_daily_news_actualites_pictures_video_uk/cassidians_newly_developed_trs-4d_naval_radar_opens_a_new_dimension_in_sensor_technology.html

Ils n'ont qu'a prendre du ARX probleme réglé: Un seul fusils pour répondre aux besoins court comme long.

ça serait pas la Cote D'ivoire? Avant hier la France à donner des P3, des camions et de l'équipement (batons, boucliers etc) Fillion ou Guéant était sur place...

Le rapport est déjà dispo http://www.eyeontheun.org/assets/attachments/documents/IAEA-Nov-2011-Report-Iran.pdf (j'aime bien Restricted Distribution / For official use only) 43. The information indicates that Iran has carried out the following activities that are relevant to the development of a nuclear explosive device: • Efforts, some successful, to procure nuclear related and dual use equipment and materials by military related individuals and entities (Annex, Sections C.1 and C.2); • Efforts to develop undeclared pathways for the production of nuclear material (Annex, Section C.3); • The acquisition of nuclear weapons development information and documentation from a clandestine nuclear supply network (Annex, Section C.4); and • Work on the development of an indigenous design of a nuclear weapon including the testing of components (Annex, Sections C.5–C.12). C.10. Conducting a test 58. The Agency has information provided by a Member State that Iran may have planned and undertaken preparatory experimentation which would be useful were Iran to carry out a test of a nuclear explosive device. In particular, the Agency has information that Iran has conducted a number of practical tests to see whether its EBW firing equipment would function satisfactorily over long distances between a firing point and a test device located down a deep shaft. Additionally, among the alleged studies documentation provided by that Member State, is a document, in Farsi, which relates directly to the logistics and safety arrangements that would be necessary for conducting a nuclear test. The Agency has been informed by a different Member State that these arrangements directly reflect those which have been used in nuclear tests conducted by nuclear-weapon States. C.11. Integration into a missile delivery vehicle 59. The alleged studies documentation contains extensive information regarding work which is alleged to have been conducted by Iran during the period 2002 to 2003 under what was known as Project 111. From that information, the project appears to have consisted of a structured and comprehensive programme of engineering studies to examine how to integrate a new spherical payload into the existing payload chamber which would be mounted in the re-entry vehicle of the Shahab 3 missile. According to that documentation, using a number of commercially available computer codes, Iran conducted computer modelling studies of at least 14 progressive design iterations of the payload chamber and its contents to examine how they would stand up to the various stresses that would be encountered on being launched and travelling on a ballistic trajectory to a target. It should be noted that the masses and dimensions of components identified in information provided to the Agency by Member States that Iran is alleged to have been developing (see paragraphs 43 and 48 above) correspond to those assessed to have been used in Project 111 engineering studies on the new payload chamber.

merci ;)

Est ce que chaque BPC a son propre équipage ou bien s'agit il d'équipage roulants / partagés ?

Le rapport vien de sortir L'Iran a planché sur une bombe nucléaire http://www.lefigaro.fr/flash-actu/2011/11/08/97001-20111108FILWWW00625-l-iran-a-planche-sur-une-bombe-nucleaire.php

Non-identical twins: FREMM frigates take to the seas In April this year, the frigate Aquitaine , lead ship of a new class of multimission combatant that will eventually form the backbone of... http://idr.janes.com/public/idr/index.shtml

C'est surtout inexplicble, voire impossible. On verra

The MoD, on Friday last, opened the commercial bids of the two contenders clearing way for further negotiations before it announces the lowest bidder. According to well-placed sources, EADS, which is promoting the more advanced and thereby more expensive aircraft is said to have quoted a lower price “unit flyaway cost.” http://www.deccanherald.com/content/203282/fighter-deal-suspense-continues.html

USAF in the 2020s -- F-15s, F-16s ... and U-2s? http://www.aviationweek.com/aw/blogs/defense/index.jsp?plckController=Blog&plckBlogPage=BlogViewPost&newspaperUserId=27ec4a53-dcc8-42d0-bd3a-01329aef79a7&plckPostId=Blog%3a27ec4a53-dcc8-42d0-bd3a-01329aef79a7Post%3a14ff6512-94e4-4af6-80d5-98b07223df30&plckScript=blogScript&plckElementId=blogDest La vache, dans 10 ans ils seront toujours sur F16c, F18A, A10, AV-8 etc... (U2 aussi :) )